Search » Advanced

Local mountain bikers propose new plan for Lionhead area

Local mountain-bike advocates are gathering support to designate 23,000 acres in the Gallatin National Forest a “National Protection Area” in hopes of keeping trails there open to mountain biking while preserving its pristine quality.


The proposed Lionhead National Protection Area would lie east of Hebgen Lake and south of Quake Lake in Gallatin and Madison counties, and perhaps include another 15,000 acres in Idaho’s Targhee County.

One advocate of the plan, Corey Biggers of Belgrade, said the designation would give the area the same level of protection as wilderness, save two aspects: it would allow mechanized trail maintenance and bicycling.

Biggers and others started pursuing the designation n which would take an act of Congress n when forest managers recommended prohibiting bikes on four trails in the area last spring.

The Lionhead was recommended for wilderness designation in 1987, and in the process of writing the most recent Gallatin travel plan, the Forest Service decided to treat the area like a wilderness, according to Steve Christiansen of the Gallatin.

Mountain bikers aren’t allowed in wilderness areas. However, because the Gallatin’s travel plan didn’t specifically spell out that mountain bikes would be banned in the Lionhead area, it must follow a lengthy procedure to put a bike ban in place.

The forest is collecting public comment on the idea, and no decision has been made yet, Christiansen said.

That gives Biggers and other mountain bikers time to try to stop it. They particularly want the forest to allow mountain bikes on four “iconic trails,” one of which is part of the Continental Divide Trail, Biggers said.

In gathering support, Biggers presented the plan to the Gallatin County Commission last week. The commission signed a letter of support for the concept.

“They could loose the status of having mountain bikes in that area,” Commissioner Joe Skinner said. “I’ve never understood the reason for not having mountain bikes in that kind of area. … The whole National Protection Area seemed like a good idea to me.”

Not everyone is sold on the idea.

Patricia Dowd, Montana conservation coordinator with the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, said public comment during the travel plan development showed “people wanted to see that area managed as designated wilderness.”

Her group supports prohibiting bikes in the Lionhead area, Dowd said, adding that there are 1,300 miles of trails and road for bicyclists elsewhere in the Gallatin.

Biggers said mountain biking does not hurt natural areas, and that NPAs have been used successfully elsewhere.

“(Mountain biking) does not degrade the wilderness experience. We do not degrade wilderness,” he said. “When you look at areas that have these n users get along.”

Daniel Person can be reached at dperson@dailychronicle.com or 582-2665.

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of The Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Please read our Online Users Agreement.

fenske_art wrote on Oct 21, 2008 7:27 AM:

" Typical response from the GYC.

You have 1300 miles, be happy we don't try and take that away. "

hikerbiker wrote on Oct 21, 2008 9:43 AM:

" I think this sounds like a sensible plan. Lionhead has languished for too long because of a "Wilderness or nothing" approach. I understand the new proposal has support from horse groups, businesses and others. Best of luck! "

montanatom1950 wrote on Oct 21, 2008 9:41 PM:

" I ride a mountain bike and I recreate in Wilderness areas frequently. How ? It's like this. Mountain bike riders are not banned from Wilderness areas. Only their bicycles are banned. When I visit Wilderness areas I leave my bicycle at home. Makes sense to me. Maybe we need a ban on Whiners in Wilderness. "

fenske_art wrote on Oct 23, 2008 12:32 PM:

" Hey Tom, the area in question is NOT wilderness and may never become wilderness.

When I choose to recreate in wilderness I too leave my mountain bike at home.

Maybe we should just ban people who want to ban people. "

naturelover wrote on May 15, 2009 11:51 PM:

" The first paragraph of this article says it all. There is no way to keep a forest "pristine" if it is opened up to mountain bikes. Mountain bikes are destructive to the landscape, scare hikers and wildlife, exploit the land for their own thrills. I'm sick of having to jump out of the way because of some *&%&*^* speeding through the woods. If they cared about nature and other trail users, they would understand how totally, utterly out of place the activity is. But they don't, because they're only into impressing each other in their own macho stunt-riding, thrill-seeking, selfish little world. Of course they degrade the wilderness, both the quality of the environment and the quality of the experience of those who truly do appreciate nature. Keep 'em out! "

You must register with a valid e-mail to post comments on BozemanDailyChronicle.com. Only your Member ID will be posted with your comments. Posts that violate our Online User Agreement will be edited or removed.

Login:

Become a Registered User

Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Web site:
 

Printer friendly version Subscribe